A recent medical study published in the October 2015 issue of the Annals of Surgery takes a closer look at whether trauma patients actually benefit from having inferior vena cava (IVC) filters implanted, or instead face a greater risk of life-threatening complications associated with the filters themselves.
The IVC Filter study, conducted by University of Michigan researchers who examined patient data from 2010 to 2014 and identified 803 cases in which trauma patients were implanted with IVC filters to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). The researchers found:
The Theory Behind IVC Filters
Over the past 30 years, the use of the IVC filter has increased in popularity. While just 2,000 filters were placed between the proximal vessels of the lower extremities and the right side of the heart in 1979, in 1990, over 120,000 IVC filters had been implanted in patients in the U.S. By the end of the decade, nearly 50,000 IVC filters were being implanted each year.
Based on principle, the IVC filter should work, yet this theory has never been validated through practical studies, and according to an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in April 2013, only one randomized controlled trial of the IVC filter was ever performed, with the results published in 1998 and an eight-year follow-up reported in 2005. The article suggested that additional studies would occur only if they are funded by the federal government, or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires them to maintain continued clearance of the device.
What We Have Seen Recently
While some IVC filters serve a very useful medical purpose, there are a select group of IVC Filters on the market that are causing unprecedented injuries and complications. Unlike many others, the specific IVC devices we are investigating were rushed onto the market without adequate testing or clinical trials and have since put patient safety in grave jeopardy. One manufacturer already has well founded allegations that it forged an FDA application to get its product(s) on the market. Select others despite approval for temporary placement only, are now in capable of being removed due to embedment and/or filter migrating. In short, some very specific IVC Filters, but certainly not all, present an ongoing danger to patients and consumers alike.
The IVC Filter Lawyers at Childers, Schlueter & Smith, LLC are investigating filter related injury claims on a no fee unless you win basis. We also offer free initial consultations.
If you have questions about your IVC Filter and question whether you are at risk for future complications, call us today or chat with us live online when prompted.
In case you missed it, check out the investigation NBC NEWS recently did on some IVC Filters: