The parties in the Bair Hugger lawsuits have each identified 16 bellwether cases from the 150 randomly selected by the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota court in January.

The lawsuits, consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL) in 2015, are related to 3M Company’s Bair Hugger Forced-Air Warming system and plaintiffs’ allegations that it caused severe infections after orthopedic surgical by spreading bacteria from the hospital floor or the inside of the device and contaminated the surgical site, causing them to develop severe and sometimes drug-resistant infections in certain circumstances. Some of these infections have been life threatening and have necessitated amputation in certain circumstances.

What are Bellwether Cases?

Bellwether cases are typically chosen based their ability to represent, at trial, the issues that will likely arise in all the cases centralized in the litigation. The intent of the bellwether process is to avoid duplicative discovery, give the parties a good indication of what might happen in future trials, and help advance the litigation in a timely manner.

The Pros and Cons of Forced-Air Warming Blankets

The 3M Bair Hugger warming blanket was intended to prevent and treat unintended hypothermia in patients by blowing hot hair into a specially designed blanket covering the patient to help maintain normal body temperature, reduce bleeding, and decrease recovery time.

However, patients who underwent hip or knee replacement surgery and were left with serious deep joint infections have brought lawsuits against 3M. According to court documents, these infections have at times necessitated:

  • Repeated hospitalizations
  • Additional surgeries
  • Insertion of antibiotic spacers in the affected joint
  • IV antibiotic therapy
  • Physical therapy
  • Removal or revision of the implant device
  • Lengthy and painful recoveries
  • Amputation of the affected limb, in some circumstances

The lawsuits also claim that 3M has known about the risk of surgical site infection for several years, but has not issued warnings or taken any other steps to redesign the device; instead, plaintiffs say, the company has taken steps to conceal and discredit scientific studies which threatened to undermine sales of the Bair Hugger system.

Free Case Evaluation

More About CSS

  • woman holding bladder with a blue background
    Published On: April 25, 2025

    If you develop cancer or a condition associated with chemical straighteners, it’s important to know your legal options and how to proceed.

  • hands of an african american stylist applying hair relaxer cream to a female customer
    Published On: March 21, 2023

    There is substantial evidence that hair relaxers increase the likelihood of certain cancers. In addition to uterine cancer, there are also links between hair relaxer products and ovarian cancer.

  • pexels-helena-ije-2867899-scaled
    Published On: March 1, 2023

    If you have been diagnosed with cancer after regularly using hair relaxer products, you could have a claim for compensation against the manufacturer even if you have underlying health conditions.

  • Hairdresser relaxing the hair on an African woman head and also using comb to stretch and apply the relaxer cream through the hair
    Published On: February 21, 2023

    Proving legal damages after using hair relaxers can be challenging, but an experienced dangerous and defective product attorney can evaluate your claim to determine if you meet certain criteria to prove damages and recover compensation.

  • white talcum powder bottle spilled on a black surface
    Published On: December 20, 2022

    Understanding how to bring a talcum powder case starts with a free consultation—get the answers you need.

  • Two hands with talcum powder spilled all over them
    Published On: September 22, 2022

    Determining eligibility for a talcum powder lawsuit involves several factors, and guidance from our experienced attorneys can make all the difference.