About Dangerous Drug Lawsuits
- Pharmaceutical manufacturers must ensure the safety of their products. If someone is harmed by a medication with a design defect, manufacturing error, or inadequate instructions, the drugmakers may be held liable.
- Individuals injured by a defective or dangerous drug may seek compensation for medical bills for hospital stays, treatment and rehabilitation, emotional distress, diminished quality of life, and other damages.
- Consulting with a dangerous drug attorney helps ensure victims are compensated for their injuries or conditions caused by an unsafe medication and that the negligent parties are held accountable.
Why Hire CSS for a Dangerous Drug Lawsuit
As the Dangerous Drug and Defective Device Attorneys, CSS Firm knows drug makers are responsible for producing medications that are safe for their intended use and for providing clear instructions and warnings to consumers. When they fall short of this obligation, it can result in severe harm and losses, spanning from physical injuries and health conditions to emotional distress and financial burdens.
At Childers, Schlueter & Smith, we prioritize the importance of holding pharmaceutical manufacturers accountable for the safety of their products. As advocates for justice, we firmly believe that individuals who are injured by a dangerous drug deserve compensation from negligent manufacturers.
Focusing on dangerous drug cases, CSS has stood up to wealthy drugmakers both at the negotiating table and in the courtroom. We are dedicated to pharmaceutical litigation and have a profound understanding of the intricate legal complexities involved in these cases – and have a track record of success to show for it. Our dangerous pharmaceuticals attorneys lead with a client-centered approach and vigorously advocate for and protect our clients’ rights and interests every step of the way.
With a history of favorable outcomes in defective drug lawsuits, CSS has earned a national reputation for excellence in the legal community. We have secured substantial settlements and verdicts on behalf of clients harmed by defective medications, showcasing our ability to deliver tangible results and obtain the compensation our clients deserve. When you choose CSS, you can rest assured that you are partnering with a team of experienced dangerous drug attorneys who will fight for what you are entitled to. Contact our firm online or call 1-800-641-0098 for a free consultation.
Dangerous Drug Cases We Handle
Every day, consumers rely on pharmaceutical companies to create and sell medications that are safe and work as intended. Sadly, as dangerous drug attorneys who specialize in this area of law, we’ve seen firsthand the harm consumers suffer when a medication has a design defect, manufacturing error, or inadequate warnings or instructions for use.
From birth control to over-the-counter heartburn medication, our attorneys are currently handling several dangerous drug lawsuits involving the following medications. However, this list is not exhaustive. If you think an illness or condition was caused by a drug you used as intended, contact our firm to discuss your case and learn your legal options.
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits
In March 2024, significant findings were released from a large-scale research study that uncovered a connection between progestogens found in Depo-Provera (the birth control shot) and an increased risk of brain meningiomas. An influx of Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits has since been filed against Pfizer, the drug manufacturer.
These dangerous drug cases allege that Pfizer failed to warn consumers of the risk of developing a brain meningioma from prolonged use of Depo-Provera. They also claim that Pfizer knew or should have known of the risks of brain tumors when their product was used as intended and that the birth control shot has a defective design.
The health effects of meningioma tumors vary, but they can cause serious and disruptive symptoms, and in some cases, they’re fatal. Many patients require surgery to remove the tumor and/or radiation therapy. While most meningiomas are benign, some can grow quickly and are likely to recur, requiring patients to undergo multiple surgeries.
Plaintiffs who have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits are seeking compensation for hospital stays, surgeries, and treatment, as well as pain and suffering, emotional stress, and other damages.
Suboxone Dental Decay Lawsuits
Opioid addiction is a national crisis. In 2021, there were more than 80,000 reported opioid deaths, close to four times the number in 2010. Treatment plans for opioid use disorder that involve medications like Suboxone, which reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms, have a crucial role in combating the opioid crisis. However, patients who used Suboxone sublingual film have reported serious dental issues – side effects they were not warned of and that have caused significant pain and required surgeries and other dental work.
In September 2023, the first case alleging that Suboxone causes dental issues was filed against the former and current manufacturers, Indivior and Reckitt Benckiser. With the similarities between the cases that followed, most Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits were consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL). As of March 2025, nearly 900 plaintiffs were part of the Suboxone dental decay MDL.
The plaintiffs claim that Suboxone manufacturers and subsidiaries failed to warn patients of the risk of dental issues that required tooth extractions, root canals, and other costly and painful treatments. They further allege that these companies knew or should have known of the risks to oral health but failed to adequately warn consumers.
The dangerous drug attorneys at CSS are confident in the strength of the Suboxone dental decay lawsuits and are still accepting clients who were harmed by the medication.
Zantac Cancer Lawsuits
Although CSS Firm is no longer accepting new Zantac claims, the once popular and widely used heartburn medication Zantac was pulled from the U.S. market in April 2020, but it was too late to stop the harm it caused to tens of thousands of people. High levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which has been connected to increased risks of cancer in many research studies, were found in Zantac and other ranitidine medications.
A significantly increased risk of several cancers, including stomach, pharyngeal, and esophageal, has all been linked to the use of the over-the-counter and prescription antacid, resulting in widespread Zantac cancer lawsuits. In fall 2024, around 80,000 lawsuits in the Zantac MDL against GSK, the Zantac drugmaker, settled for $2.2 billion. Other manufacturers who made their own versions of Zantac are also facing lawsuits.
The impact of a cancer diagnosis can be devastating, and extensive treatments and time off work are often required. Sadly, many Zantac lawsuits involve wrongful death and were filed by surviving families of victims who depended on the heartburn medication to be safe to use as intended.
The plaintiffs allege that drugmakers knew or should have known of the high levels of NDMA in their product and that they failed to warn consumers and healthcare professionals of the risks. They also claim the drug should have been packaged differently, along with how it was stored and transported. Plaintiffs have accused GSK of hiding known dangers and misleading the FDA.
Establishing Fault in Dangerous Drug Cases
Pharmaceutical manufacturers have a duty to produce products that are safe for their intended use. If consumers use a drug according to the dosage instructions, they should know what potential side effects could occur and should not encounter unexpected illnesses or injuries. Healthcare professionals who recommend, prescribe, and administer medications also need to know potential risks and interactions to ensure the best treatments for their patients. When drugmakers fail in their duty to protect consumers, a dangerous pharmaceuticals lawsuit may be pursued, but plaintiffs must establish fault.
To prevail in a product liability case that states a drug was unreasonably dangerous or defective, one of the following must be proven:
- A design defect resulted in a dangerous substance
- Errors in the manufacturing process resulted in a dangerous product
- The drugmaker did not provide proper instructions for safe use or adequate warnings
In addition, the injured person will also need to demonstrate that the person or entity owed them reasonable care, failed to provide this care, and as a result, injuries occurred. Speaking with a qualified attorney from Childers, Schlueter, & Smith can help individuals to better understand their legal options and the process for proving liability in a dangerous drug claim.
Types of Damages in a Dangerous Drug Claim
Drug companies that cause injuries to customers by allowing unsafe products to be on the market can be held liable for any resulting harm. Possible compensation includes payment for the medical care needed to treat physical injuries. This can involve an ambulance ride, ER treatment, hospitalization, surgeries, and rehabilitation. If the injury will have long-term or permanent health effects, compensation for future medical bills can also be sought in a dangerous drug lawsuit.
However, defective medications can impact more than just a person’s physical health. They may also cause significant harm to an individual’s emotional well-being and quality of life. Lost wages from time off work and the impact the injury has on the victim’s family are other factors that affect the value of a dangerous drug lawsuit. Those who sustain these kinds of harm are entitled to seek such damages in addition to what is provided for their physical injuries.
When a defect with the design or manufacturing of a medication or inadequate warnings or instructions for use causes you harm, our attorneys can help. We’ll help demonstrate that your unexpected illness or injury was a result of a negligent party and seek the compensation you deserve. If a loved one died from the use of a dangerous drug, the surviving family may be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit on their behalf.
Contact Our Dangerous Drug Attorneys for Trusted Legal Guidance
If you or a family member developed a severe illness or condition or suffered a serious side effect you weren’t warned of after taking medication, you may be eligible to seek compensation. These cases are complex and require a thorough investigation, extensive evidence, and the use of medical experts to get victims the compensation they’re entitled to.
Pharmaceutical companies have deep pockets and legal teams at the ready to fight to protect their bottom line. You need a dangerous drug attorney with a proven track record to protect your rights and hold negligent drugmakers responsible for the harm and losses you’ve suffered.
Our dedicated dangerous drug lawyers are ready to listen to your story. Contact Childers, Schlueter, & Smith online or at 1-800-641-0098 to set up a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
Frequently Asked Questions
After seeking medical attention, it is crucial to consult with a dangerous drug attorney to explore your legal options and determine the best course of action for seeking compensation from the negligent party.
For a successful dangerous drug case, you have to prove that your injury was caused by a medication that was designed or manufactured in a way that made it unreasonably dangerous or that the drug had inadequate instructions for safe use. Establishing fault is a key component of these cases.
Compensation for injuries from taking a defective or dangerous drug may include medical expenses for hospital stays, treatment and rehabilitation, lost wages, emotional distress, diminished quality of life, and other damages.
An attorney with experience in handling dangerous drug lawsuits understands the complexity of these cases. They have the resources to demonstrate liability and prove that your injury resulted from the dangerous substance and can pursue financial compensation for a range of damages.
The statute of limitations to file a dangerous drug lawsuit in Georgia is generally two years from the date of injury, but there are some exceptions to the rule (Ie, the Georgia Discovery Rule, etc.). These cases take time to build, so it’s important to speak with an experienced attorney as soon as possible if you’re harmed by a medication.
The amount a dangerous or defective drug lawsuit is worth depends on several factors, including the seriousness of the injury or illness, how it affects the victim, whether it will have a long-term impact, and more. A skilled attorney has the resources needed to demonstrate the depth of harm a victim has suffered to ensure adequate compensation is awarded.
The length of time a dangerous drug lawsuit takes to reach a settlement or jury award varies, but it typically takes at least a couple of years. In some cases, the defective medication harms numerous people, sometimes hundreds or thousands, resulting in multidistrict litigation or class actions that take longer to resolve. Building a dangerous pharmaceutical case requires extensive evidence gathering, and when many people suffer similar harm, coordinating and adding plaintiffs to large-scale litigation can add years to the resolution.
Dupixent, also known as its generic name, dupilumab, is used to treat specific inflammatory conditions, including eczema, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, eosinophilic esophagitis, prurigo nodularis, chronic hives, COPD, and bullous pemphigoid. Many of these are skin conditions.
The most common side effects of Dupixent are injection site reactions, such as swelling, redness, and bruising, and eye problems, including pink eye, dryness, and blurred vision. There are more serious side effects of dupilumab: severe allergic reactions, vasculitis, joint pain that can limit mobility, psoriasis, and severe eye problems, including corneal ulcers. Any changes to your health when you start taking a new medication should be addressed with your healthcare provider, and if serious issues develop, seek immediate medical attention.
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that typically progresses slowly. Early signs and symptoms of CTCL include dry, red, scaly patches or bumps in the skin, which can be mistaken for eczema or other skin conditions. Diagnosed through a biopsy and other tests if needed, CTCL is treatable but not curable. Early intervention is important.
Recent research studies have linked the use of Dupixent to a significantly increased relative risk of developing CTCL, but it has not been proven to be a direct cause of the disease. The exact cause is unknown, though doctors think it can be triggered by certain infections and types of inflammation, genetic factors, and environmental exposure.
Dangerous drug lawsuits that are being filed against manufacturers of dupilumab/Dupixent allege that the medication caused plaintiffs’ diagnoses of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Research has shown that patients who were treated with dupilumab have a three to four-and-a-half times increased relative risk of developing CTCL than those who weren’t treated with the drug.
Anyone who was diagnosed with CTCL after taking dupilumab/Dupixent should speak with a dangerous pharmaceuticals attorney to discuss their legal options. Many factors affect these cases, and an experienced lawyer can assess your individual case to determine whether you should file a Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit.
There’s significant evidence that dupilumab is linked to a higher relative risk of developing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. If you were diagnosed with CTCL and took Dupixent, you may be eligible to seek compensation for physical, emotional, and financial damages like medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. But dangerous drug lawsuits can do more than fairly compensate you. They help create high safety standards in the pharmaceutical industry, prevent others from suffering the same situation, and ensure consumers are aware of all potential risks associated with a medication so they can make an informed decision.
Free Case Evaluation
Dangerous Drugs Attorneys
Recent Dangerous Drugs News
Research suggests Dupixent (dupilumab) may be linked to an increased risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Learn what studies show, how CTCL may be misdiagnosed as eczema, and the legal options for patients diagnosed with lymphoma after taking Dupixent.
Childers, Schlueter & Smith has filed the first Dupixent lawsuit in Georgia, alleging a link between the eczema drug and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The complaint highlights questions about risk disclosure.
A recent FDA-approved label change now warns of brain meningioma risks linked to Depo-Provera. This update explains what changed, why lawsuits are being filed, and what the warning may mean for women diagnosed with brain tumors.
While Suboxone helps fight opioid addiction, it’s now at the center of a growing legal battle over severe, preventable dental harm not disclosed to patients for years.
Women across the U.S. are filing lawsuits against Pfizer after a major study linked long-term use of Depo-Provera to a fivefold increase in the risk of developing brain tumors known as meningiomas.
Women diagnosed with meningiomas after using Depo-Provera may be eligible for financial compensation, as lawsuits claim Pfizer failed to warn about the potential risk of brain tumors.
