Follow us:

Darvon, Darvocet (Propoxyphene) Withdrawn Due To Risk of Cardiac Toxicity

Posted on

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is recommending against continued prescribing and use of the pain reliever propoxyphene because new data show that the drug can cause serious toxicity to the heart, even when used at therapeutic doses. FDA has requested that companies voluntarily withdraw propoxyphene from the United States market.

Propoxyphene is an opioid pain reliever used to treat mild to moderate pain. It is sold under various names as a single-ingredient product (e.g., Darvon) and as part of a combination product with acetaminophen (e.g., Darvocet).

Propoxyphene Withdrawl

FDA’s recommendation is based on all available data including data from a new study that evaluated the effects that increasing doses of propoxyphene have on the heart (see Data Summary below). The results of the new study showed that when propoxyphene was taken at therapeutic doses, there were significant changes to the electrical activity of the heart: prolonged PR interval, widened QRS complex and prolonged QT interval. These changes, which can be seen on an electrocardiogram (ECG), can increase the risk for serious abnormal heart rhythms. FDA has concluded that the safety risks of propoxyphene outweigh its benefits for pain relief at recommended doses.

In July 2009, FDA announced an ongoing safety review of propoxyphene, which included evaluating its potential effects on the heart.

Additional Information for Patients

If you currently take propoxyphene-containing products, you should:

Dispose of unused propoxyphene in your household trash by following the recommendations outlined in the Federal Drug Disposal Guidelines:

Additional Information for Healthcare Professionals

FDA recommends that healthcare professionals:

Data Summary

Following receipt of a Citizen Petition requesting the withdrawal of propoxyphene-containing products from the United States market, FDA convened an Advisory Committee meeting on January 30, 2009. After presentations by FDA, the petitioner, and the company reviewing the efficacy and safety data from the propoxyphene drug applications, the literature and postmarketing safety databases, the committee voted by a narrow margin (14-to-12) against the continued marketing of propoxyphene products. Those who voted for propoxyphene to remain on the market advised requiring improved labeling, particularly with warnings about use in elderly patients and about use with concomitant opioids or alcohol. Finally, there was general agreement that additional information about the cardiac effects of propoxyphene would be relevant in further weighing the risk and benefit. As a result, under new authorities given to FDA by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), the agency required the drug manufacturer to conduct a thorough QT study to formally evaluate the effects of propoxyphene on cardiac electrophysiology. In order to determine a safe supratherapeutic dose to incorporate into the Thorough QT study, FDA required the drug manufacturer to first conduct a multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study.

The MAD study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled sequential multiple-ascending dose study of propoxyphene for 11 days. The study was conducted in healthy volunteers. The first cohort of study subjects was dosed with a total daily dose of 600 mg of propoxyphene (the maximum labeled dose) and the second cohort was dosed with a total daily dose of 900 mg. Additional doses were planned, however the study was placed on clinical hold due to safety concerns. Study subjects were monitored with telemetry and intermittent ECG recordings, comparable to the monitoring that would occur during a Thorough QT study. The drug manufacturer has submitted to FDA the results from the 600 mg and 900 mg cohorts.

Significant QTc interval prolongations were observed with the propoxyphene 600 mg and 900 mg dose levels. With the 600 mg daily dose, at steady state on Treatment Day 11, the largest mean change of QTcF* (ΔΔQTcF) was 29.8 milliseconds (ms), which occurred 7 hours after the last dose; with the 900 mg dose the largest mean change was 38.2 ms, which occurred 2 hours after the last dose. It is recognized in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 Guideline1 that drugs that prolong the mean QT/QTc interval by >20 ms have a substantially increased likelihood of being proarrhythmic. In addition, a dose-dependent prolongation of PR and QRS intervals was observed in the study.

Because the elderly and patients with renal insufficiency have a reduction in the clearance of propoxyphene and its cardioactive metabolite, norpropoxyphene, through the kidneys, these populations can be especially susceptible to proarrhythmic effects of the drug.

FDA has concluded that the safety risks of propoxyphene outweigh its limited benefits2-6 for pain relief at recommended doses.

*QTcF is the QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (cubic root – QTcF = QT/RR1/3).


Darvon/Darvocet is also known by the names: Darvon-N, PP-Cap, Balacet, Darvocet A500, Darvocet-N, Darvon Compound 32, Darvon Compound-65, PC-CAP, Propacet, Propoxyphene Compound 65, and Wygesic.

Speak to a Darvon Lawyer and a Darvocet Lawyer

Thousands of victims of Darvon-related Cardiac Toxicity and Darvocet-related Cardiac Toxicity victims are searching for answers about their health and future courses of treatment. If you or a family member has been diagnosed with Cardiac Toxicity and been prescribed Darvon, Darvocet or generic Propoxyphene, contact Childers, Schlueter & Smith to speak to a Darvon Darvocet lawyer about your legal options. The initial consultation is free. Educate yourself on these newly detailed issues and know how to best protect your legal rights.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.